000 | 01523nab a22002657 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | H004.652.4 DIS | ||
003 | AR-sfUTN | ||
008 | 190909b xx |||p|r|||| 00| 0 spa d | ||
040 | _cAR-sfUTN | ||
080 | _aH004.652.4 DIS | ||
100 | _aLin, Jun-Lin | ||
700 | _aDunham, Margaret H. | ||
700 | _aNascimento, Mario A. | ||
245 | _aA survey of distributed database checkpointing | ||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atexto _btxt |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _asin mediaciĆ³n _bn |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolumen _bnc |
||
505 | _aCheckpointing a database is a vital technique to reduce the recovery time in the presence of a failure. For distributed databases, checkpointing also provides an efficient way to perform global reconstruction. In this paper, we survey and classify previous approaches for checkpointing a distributed database. Since the need for global reconstruction is infrequent in most distributed databases, a less restrictive and less resource-consuming approach to checkpoint distributed databases in an integrated distributed database system is recommended over a transaction consistent checkpoint approach. For a federated or multidatabase system, any type of global consistent checkpoint is difficult to achieve without violating local autonomy. | ||
650 | _aCHECKPOINTING | ||
650 | _aDISTRIBUTED | ||
650 | _aDATABASES | ||
773 |
_tDistributed and parallel databases _wH004.652.4 DIS _nS.T.:H004.652.4 DIS PP2672 _g(vol. 5, nro. 3, Jul. 1997), p. 289-319 |
||
942 | _cAN | ||
999 |
_c35468 _d35468 |